But you don’t know what it can be used for. Components for us to build a fast UFO Engine Space Ship based on scientific results, tests, patents and inventions that many of you have created with the use listed as “unknown.” Meaning you have created an invention. I found out this fact AFTER I had decoded the answers to EACh equation found in LInes 1 and 27 of the data that i picked around the 6EQUJ5 number. They are in relation to the way the MAYA did their ancient math equations over 3000 years ago. The WOW! alien radio signal received by NASA and SETI Institute on Aughas hidden math equations in it. I intend based on real scientific evidence and archaeological artifacts along with alien species, UFO Sightings and finally the crop circles to figure out if we are believing in something that exists or if it’s all in our imaginations. The project started Decemwith an “alien meditation.” After hearing President Barack Obama’s speech on the fact that the USA government has no proof of any alien contact with earth. I drew a mind map of line equations on the WOW! theory dated Januwhen I start to video blog my findings. Black hole drawing create a wormhole within a wormhole the idea girl says linda randall Get six of our favorite Motherboard stories every day by signing up for our newsletter. The search for extraterrestrial life continues. To that end, Lintott has spent the weekend putting together a public list of questions for Paris to answer about his paper, including contributions from other astronomers. If the explanation doesn't fit the data, you have to be a little suspect." Shostak said that the comet explanation "would be an interesting result if true," but that the data just doesn't back it up: "You may as well say it's due to ghosts or due to reality television or something. Emotions should not have any part in science." "There are too many people 'excited' or 'upset' about this project. "I am not in the business of responding to emotions," he told Motherboard. Image: Big Ear Radio Observatory and North American AstroPhysical Observatory (NAAPO).īut Paris has kicked back against what he calls an "emotional" response. Ehman, who discovered the anomaly in August 1977. "Saying 'The Wow signal might be a comet if comets do something we haven't seen them doing' seems not very exciting."Ī Reddit user, also claiming to be a radio astronomer, posted a lengthy takedown of Paris' paper over the weekend, arguing, "This paper was also just really, really, really short on details that a radio astronomer would want, to the point where it likely wouldn't have passed a referee at a 'regular' journal." So at best the paper shows that comets are detectable in the radio-not that they're capable of the kind of burst that produced the Wow signal," Lintott told Motherboard. "The claimed detection-even if it's real-is much, much weaker than the Wow signal, and lasts for longer. "Saying 'The Wow signal might not be a comet if comets do something we haven't seen them doing' seems not very exciting." Paris said he had even received a phone call from a technician who helped build the Big Ear telescope who was excited that "the mystery has been solved." But Paris' research is still in the firing line. It doesn't move across the sky in a minute. "With Wow, it found it in one feed but it doesn't find it in the second. If it observes something in the sky, it's always reobserved 70 seconds later with a second feed," he said. "The Ohio State radio telescope has two receivers on it. Shostak says he finds Paris's paper hard to believe based on what other astronomers have observed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |